22 března, 2025
Pilkington CJ, Kern W and you will Indest D, Are secure sex expected that have a great “safe” companion?
Posted in : online mail order bride on by : Hedy
21. Ott MA et al., The fresh new exchange-off between hormonal contraceptives and you will condoms among adolescents, Point of views towards Sexual and you may Reproductive Health, 2002, 34(1):6–14.
twenty-two. Wilson EK and you may Koo Hp, Connectivity between lowest-income women’s relationship functions and their birth control explore, Point of views on Sexual and you will Reproductive Wellness, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC mais aussi al., Family unit members and you may pal intimacy in order to teenage sexual couples for the relationship to condom play with, Diary off Teenage Health, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA et al., The new developmental relationship out of dating top quality, hormonal contraceptive alternatives and you can condom non-play with certainly one of adolescent women, Diary regarding Teenage Wellness, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
twenty-five. Umphrey L and you can Sherblom J, Relational union and you may risks so you’re able to relationship maintenance needs: affects on condom use, Log of Western University Wellness, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
twenty seven. Manning WD ainsi que al., Younger adult dating matchmaking and also the handling of sexual exposure, Inhabitants Look and you may Rules Feedback, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
28. Manlove J mais aussi al., Teen mothers when you look at the foster proper care: chance items and you may results for childhood as well as their people, Search Short term, Arizona, DC: Youngster Style, 2011.
30. DiClemente RJ mais aussi al., Sexual exposure behavior regarding the having old sex lovers: a study of black colored adolescent women, Sexually Carried Infection 2002, 29(1):20–24.
thirty two. Fortenberry JD mais aussi al., Condom fool around with because a purpose of time in the latest and you can situated teenage sexual relationship, Western Log out of Societal Wellness, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Risk and you can defensive situations of change in order to an initial sexual relationship with an adult lover, Log regarding Teenage Fitness, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Birth prevention fool around with designs across teens‘ sexual dating, papers displayed on annual fulfilling of the People Organization from The usa, Philadelphia, .
thirty five. Manning WD, Giordano Desktop and you will Longmore MA, Connecting: the partnership contexts regarding “nonrelationship” sex, Log regarding Teenage Research, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
36. Carlson MJ and you may Furstenberg FF, Jr, The results regarding multiple-partnered virility having adult info and you will dating, papers displayed in the yearly meeting of your own Connection to have Societal Plan Studies and you will Government, Washington, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and you may Graefe DR, Selecting a mate? This new relationship and cohabitation histories out of unwed moms and dads, in: Wu LL and you can Wolfe B, eds., Off Wedlock: Reasons and you may Outcomes regarding Nonmarital Virility, Ny: Russell Sage Foundation, 2001, pp. 317–343.
forty. Kirby D, Growing Responses 2007: Search Findings towards the Programs to attenuate Teen Maternity and you may Sexually Sent Illness, Arizona, DC: Federal Venture to avoid Teenager and Unplanned Maternity, 2007.
41. Kirby D, This new impression regarding programs to increase birth prevention play with certainly adult female: a peek at fresh and you may quasi-fresh studies, Point of views into the Sexual and you may Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Affiliations
Jennifer Manlove are program town manager and senior research scientist, Kate Welti are research researcher, Age Wildsmith is actually older search researcher and Megan Barry is actually browse expert, all at the Youngster Styles, Bethesda, MD.
Records
In the 1st investigation, that used a region-city take to from adolescents within the Kansas, Manning and acquaintances 9 grouped matchmaking attributes on you to index of self-confident characteristics (such personal mind-disclosure, romantic like and you can relationship salience) plus one list of negative services (such as for example argument and nonexclusivity). They learned that large ratings on the often index had been regarding the quicker condom texture. Descriptive analyses including advised you to definitely a combination of high confident and you can higher bad scores was regarding the less condom structure.
When you look at the for each and every bullet, participants was asked „As the big date of last interview, will you be within the an online dating relationship for which you imagine away from oneself as part of one or two?“ We experienced respondents to stay a dating relationships when they answered yes while brand new mate try a recently available matchmaking lover, in the place of a spouse, cohabiting partner or previous companion. Same-sex matchmaking relationship and people where the respondent got in earlier times cohabited on the mate have been excluded. Complete, 4,013 respondents claimed a recently available dating dating through the 2002–2005. Of left respondents, 553 were not about sample for the series of great interest, step 1,876 have been cohabiting or hitched, and you can dos,542 had no most recent matchmaking relationships. Respondents inside our try have been old 18–26.
Matchmaking commitment are centered on one or two steps. The first is good 0–ten size where respondents rated the chance which they and you will their spouse might possibly be to one another during the 6 months. A get off zero shown no chance; a good 10 shown 100% possibilities. I classified that it probability just like the reduced (below 6), medium (6–9) or highest (10). To the 2nd measure of commitment, we incorporated a varying to possess whether or not the pair had talked about wedding or cohabitation; solutions had been categorized as the chatted about neither, talked about cohabitation or chatted about relationships. (Respondents whom advertised with discussed one another cohabitation and you can relationship was provided throughout the matrimony classification.)
Heterogeneous birth-control effects in this longer term dating may also help determine down birth control structure into the offered teenage dating, even with higher odds of actually ever-accessibility contraceptives. 32, 33 Previous studies have interpreted which looking of the positing you to definitely couples are able to from time to time forgo birth prevention use in more severe dating; thirty-two, 34 but not, all of our abilities advise that faster contraceptive have fun with are concentrated in long-er term relationship characterized by higher argument minimizing commitment.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Florida and you will Pleck JH, The brand new personality from younger men’s room condom play with through the and you may across relationship, Members of the family Thought Point of views, 1994, 26(6):246–251.